This is the first I've heard about this, so I didn't have a chance to get outraged before I saw it in this context.

That said, I'm not sure I would have gotten outraged. It sounds, well, too right. More like "Oh, well, that explains why he does what he does, if he doesn't believe in the Constitution." More confirmation than outrage, you know?

But, yeah. Without more evidence that it was said, even that gets to go with a grain of salt.