ext_13277 ([identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] demiurgent 2007-12-04 02:41 am (UTC)

They may be willing to reconsider that position if proof that a god does not exist is presented

Which is a trick, because
1) proof of nonexistence is impossible. Logically, factually, take your pick. You can't prove nonexistence. You can only disprove existence of a specific thing in a specific testable form.
2) "proof" of anything at all outside of abstracts like mathematics is impossible. There's specifically no such thing as proof in science.

Post a comment in response:

You may post here only if demiurgent has given you access; posting by non-Access List accounts has been disabled.
(will be screened if not on Access List)
(will be screened if not on Access List)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
No Subject Icon Selected
More info about formatting

Loading anti-spam test...

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org