ext_3281 ([identity profile] ronin-kakuhito.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] demiurgent 2007-12-04 03:50 am (UTC)

Agnostic here, and a scientist, but only a dilettante in physics and cosmology, but yeah, that's my understanding of cosmology. Time is a property of the universe, so before and after are reliant on the existence of said universe. Before the beginning of the universe is a null concept.

This does not lend itself to nice simple analogies, but neither does any of physics in the last century and some change. Even beginning physics books these days are full of things to which there are no good analogies in the macro-scale world. (Definitely in the micro scale, and I am pretty sure on the mega scale, there are things that don't fit cleanly into planet orbit and bread box analogies.)

Post a comment in response:

You may post here only if demiurgent has given you access; posting by non-Access List accounts has been disabled.
(will be screened if not on Access List)
(will be screened if not on Access List)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org