demiurgent (
demiurgent) wrote2008-03-13 12:11 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
A question for those in the know, involving the word OSRIC
Hey gang -- a quick question to the RPG developers in the crowd. And you know who you are.
Does anyone know if OSRIC's been juried or otherwise 'acknowledged' to be legitimate? I know they believe that they're in the clear, but their contention that the underlying algorithms of First Edition AD&D are reverse-engineerable without trouble sounds... I dunno. I'm not sure about it, and I don't want to get too far in the project I'm working on without knowing more.
Thanks!
Does anyone know if OSRIC's been juried or otherwise 'acknowledged' to be legitimate? I know they believe that they're in the clear, but their contention that the underlying algorithms of First Edition AD&D are reverse-engineerable without trouble sounds... I dunno. I'm not sure about it, and I don't want to get too far in the project I'm working on without knowing more.
Thanks!
Reverse-enginer AD&D 1st Edition?
I think it would be difficult to prove in court how someone could duplicate THAC-0 independently of AD&D. I'm not sure how reverse engineering would work in a game, but for it to be legal in computers the safest thing to do (from a legal perspective) is to black-box it:
1. One person examines and documents how an application works (i.e., when I press "a", "b" happens, only in much more detail than that).
2. Another person, who was not involved with the examination part of the project in any way, programs a new application based on the first person's documentation.
It would be hard to do that for a printed game that has been one of the foundations of RPGs. It would be really hard to prove it in court. That said, not a lawyer, and I might be more paranoid than the situation warrants.
It'd be cool if they could do it, though.
Re: Reverse-enginer AD&D 1st Edition?
I'm still right!
Re: I'm still right!
Re: I'm still right!
2nd Edition... my unseen nemesis
no subject
Damn gub'mint.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
thank you
(Anonymous) 2008-04-05 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)