demiurgent (
demiurgent) wrote2006-08-22 01:28 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Devil's advocate, I remember being taught it was illegal to let the flag get *wet.*
A social studies teacher named Dan Holden burned two American flags in front of his seventh grade social studies class. He didn't do it out of protest, or anger. He did it raise issues in class about freedom of speech. He assigned papers to the class, who were supposed to take a stand, in favor of protecting his speech or in favor of protecting the flag from desecration.
He did this thing to make the subject immediate and poignant -- not just another drab class discussion about an issue that feels at best remote and hypothetical to twelve year old kids. Which is remarkable, when one considers Holden was a veteran teacher, going into his twenty-seventh year at that school. A lot of teachers going into their twenty-seventh school year would just do what worked last year.
He has now been suspended, pending investigations of the "incident." The school has cited 'safety concerns' about open flame, which is thinly disguised dressing over the real issue at hand: the fact that he burned a flag.
Here's what I feel on the subject: Dan Holden wanted to make several points to his class. He wanted to teach them about freedom of speech most of all.
Well, I think it's safe to say those seventh graders have had an education in freedom of speech. I think every day their substitute teacher walks through the door of the class they're reminded of what Dan Holden taught them about freedom of speech.
He did this thing to make the subject immediate and poignant -- not just another drab class discussion about an issue that feels at best remote and hypothetical to twelve year old kids. Which is remarkable, when one considers Holden was a veteran teacher, going into his twenty-seventh year at that school. A lot of teachers going into their twenty-seventh school year would just do what worked last year.
He has now been suspended, pending investigations of the "incident." The school has cited 'safety concerns' about open flame, which is thinly disguised dressing over the real issue at hand: the fact that he burned a flag.
Here's what I feel on the subject: Dan Holden wanted to make several points to his class. He wanted to teach them about freedom of speech most of all.
Well, I think it's safe to say those seventh graders have had an education in freedom of speech. I think every day their substitute teacher walks through the door of the class they're reminded of what Dan Holden taught them about freedom of speech.
no subject
That's one generation of students that will learn to keep their mouths shut.
Nutless cowards?
Maybe not, though. Maybe they're just thoughless pro-silence pro-government-is-always-right activists.
no subject
Leaving it to get tattered and faded and beat to hell on the antenna of your SUV or on a magnet stuck on the back aren't. And honestly are more offensive to me than the people who burn a flag as a political statement. I guess it's one of those things I just don't get.
And this makes a total of two incidents of flag burning I've heard of in the past six years, at least. And one of those was some teenagers spoling for a fight at some anti-war protests in DC. Which they didn't get, and when they got bored of not fighting, several bystanders came over and put out the flag and took the remains for proper disposal.
But even then, the flag is just cloth. It's a representation of an idea, but it's still a piece of cloth. Hurting the cloth doesn't hurt the idea.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Or, well, maybe they're not.
Looks like at least one of those students learned the wrong lesson.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
A lot of what we learn as children is so intrinsic to us that oftentimes we may not realize it. Like how elementary school children are taught the Pledge of Allegiance before they know what words like "pledge" and "allegiance" mean.
Let's just hope those kids grow up telling stories about how their teacher was suspended for his stance of freedom of speech, rather than stories about how their teacher burned a flag in class.
no subject
An important lesson on free expression, and it only cost the school district $15,000.
no subject
It's also sad that a teacher who is apparently constantly thinking of ways to get his students to be interested and involved in critical thinking (an incredibly rare creature these days) should be punished in any way. It's no wonder our nation is illiterate, and that teachers are rewarded for longevity rather than skill or creativity. It's no wonder that we get adminstrators such as the ones in this case, who apparently have never been taught to think critically.