No, because every system must start with givens, stark definitions.
He's set out that the system he is using to analyze these arguments use as a definition for "to believe," "to assert that a particular fact is true." The definition he's using for "to know," implies, "to have unshakable proof that a fact is true, without any possibility of doubt."
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-03 08:38 pm (UTC)He's set out that the system he is using to analyze these arguments use as a definition for "to believe," "to assert that a particular fact is true."
The definition he's using for "to know," implies, "to have unshakable proof that a fact is true, without any possibility of doubt."