(no subject)

Date: 2007-12-04 08:11 pm (UTC)
Calling something evidence and it being evidence are two different things.

Also,
I would suggest instead that 'knowledge' is information that has been tested via rigorous peer review via the scientific method.

is describing one of the manners of developing a justification for and verifying the truth of a belief, and thus yielding knowledge. There are other ways to develop knowledge. Formal scientific method yields good results in cases where inductive reasoning is needed, but it is unneeded in cases where direct experience is needed. Also there are many sorts of things that you can not apply the scientific method to that you can still have knowledge of. (I've said this before in this thread: setting aside strong Cartesian skepticism) You can know your internal states in the absence of the SM, you can know things from your past in the absence of SM, and you can know the existence of external objects without having to apply the scientific method (though you do have to answer the Cartesian skeptic for both the past and the existence of outside objects.)
You may post here only if demiurgent has given you access; posting by non-Access List accounts has been disabled.
(will be screened if not on Access List)
(will be screened if not on Access List)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

demiurgent: (Default)
demiurgent

June 2013

S M T W T F S
      1
234 5678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags