demiurgent: (Default)
[personal profile] demiurgent
Eric: So... the Catholic Church is re-emphasizing--

Weds: Plenary indulgences. Yes. I know.

Eric: But... wait. Plenary indulgences reduce your time in Purgatory. They have no impact on Hell.

Weds: And?

Eric: Didn't they abolish the very concept of Purgatory like a year ago?

Weds: It's back. In Pog form.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-10 01:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] forvrin.livejournal.com
You, Sir are WRONG, so WRONG in your WRONGNESS with the soft, spongy underbelly of RIGHT that is WRONG that you ... er, smell. wrongly.

Ahem.

If you had been paying attention, you would have realized that LIMBO is not the same as PURGATORY.

Despite both showing up in Dante's Inferno. WRONG.

Even so, I will allow that not everyone in the world can meet my exacting standard of goodness and light. Its a constant source of disappointment, but the burden of those as Amazing as myself.

(wrong...)

:P



(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-10 01:55 pm (UTC)
ext_137509: (Default)
From: [identity profile] usagijer.livejournal.com
ALF == Purgatory ????

This Explains EVERYTHING!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-10 03:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ursulav.livejournal.com
My brain hurts.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-10 04:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] interlocutron.livejournal.com
Yeah, seriously, Eric. Limbo is where you o when you aren't allowed into Heaven. Purgatory is the hazing ritual for getting into the club.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-10 04:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] interlocutron.livejournal.com
Oh, I thought indulgences were for saving your bacon. Now it doesn't seem so ridiculous.

Well, except for the part about wasting material rewards on reducing the wait time before you get your infinite stay in Heaven. Wouldn't you rather live it up and consider Purgatory your last intersting life experience? After all, it's probably going to be the first time in years that you can lift and carry that much weight.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-10 06:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elvedril.livejournal.com
except for the part about wasting material rewards on reducing the wait time before you get your infinite stay in Heaven

Wasting material rewards? As the article states very clearly, indulgences are not bought, they're given for meeting a set of criteria.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-10 06:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] interlocutron.livejournal.com
I say time is money, so it still counts as material rewards.

Also, I was too lazy to look up just what a plenary indulgence required. :D

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-10 06:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] demiurgent.livejournal.com
But it's an understandable conflation -- for most lay people, indulgences refer back to the medieval practice of selling indulgences for gold. While the modern system's an attempt to bring... well, a modern sense of bookkeeping to the process of reducing the burden of venal sin, essentially, and doesn't actually involve indulgence for cash, that's what a lot of people will believe when they first hear the term.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-10 07:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] redneckgaijin.livejournal.com
No kidding.

My first thought on reading your post (since I can't be bothered to register with the NYTimes) was: First anti-Semitism, then placing gay-bashing over anti-torture, and now selling indulgences? Is Ratzinger actually TRYING to destroy the Catholic Church?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-10 10:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cmdr-zoom.livejournal.com
No, just trying to turn back time to when it was The Only Game In Town.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-11 05:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] prodigal.livejournal.com
Remember Purgatory? It's back. as Pogs!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-12 03:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miyaa99.livejournal.com
I just have one question: what is a Pog?