An actual conversation in my house.
Feb. 10th, 2009 12:00 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Eric: So... the Catholic Church is re-emphasizing--
Weds: Plenary indulgences. Yes. I know.
Eric: But... wait. Plenary indulgences reduce your time in Purgatory. They have no impact on Hell.
Weds: And?
Eric: Didn't they abolish the very concept of Purgatory like a year ago?
Weds: It's back. In Pog form.
Weds: Plenary indulgences. Yes. I know.
Eric: But... wait. Plenary indulgences reduce your time in Purgatory. They have no impact on Hell.
Weds: And?
Eric: Didn't they abolish the very concept of Purgatory like a year ago?
Weds: It's back. In Pog form.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-10 04:20 pm (UTC)Well, except for the part about wasting material rewards on reducing the wait time before you get your infinite stay in Heaven. Wouldn't you rather live it up and consider Purgatory your last intersting life experience? After all, it's probably going to be the first time in years that you can lift and carry that much weight.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-10 06:14 pm (UTC)Wasting material rewards? As the article states very clearly, indulgences are not bought, they're given for meeting a set of criteria.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-10 06:35 pm (UTC)Also, I was too lazy to look up just what a plenary indulgence required. :D
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-10 06:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-10 07:05 pm (UTC)My first thought on reading your post (since I can't be bothered to register with the NYTimes) was: First anti-Semitism, then placing gay-bashing over anti-torture, and now selling indulgences? Is Ratzinger actually TRYING to destroy the Catholic Church?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-10 10:05 pm (UTC)