demiurgent (
demiurgent) wrote2009-02-10 12:00 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
An actual conversation in my house.
Eric: So... the Catholic Church is re-emphasizing--
Weds: Plenary indulgences. Yes. I know.
Eric: But... wait. Plenary indulgences reduce your time in Purgatory. They have no impact on Hell.
Weds: And?
Eric: Didn't they abolish the very concept of Purgatory like a year ago?
Weds: It's back. In Pog form.
Weds: Plenary indulgences. Yes. I know.
Eric: But... wait. Plenary indulgences reduce your time in Purgatory. They have no impact on Hell.
Weds: And?
Eric: Didn't they abolish the very concept of Purgatory like a year ago?
Weds: It's back. In Pog form.
no subject
Ahem.
If you had been paying attention, you would have realized that LIMBO is not the same as PURGATORY.
Despite both showing up in Dante's Inferno. WRONG.
Even so, I will allow that not everyone in the world can meet my exacting standard of goodness and light. Its a constant source of disappointment, but the burden of those as Amazing as myself.
(wrong...)
:P
no subject
no subject
This Explains EVERYTHING!
no subject
no subject
Well, except for the part about wasting material rewards on reducing the wait time before you get your infinite stay in Heaven. Wouldn't you rather live it up and consider Purgatory your last intersting life experience? After all, it's probably going to be the first time in years that you can lift and carry that much weight.
no subject
Wasting material rewards? As the article states very clearly, indulgences are not bought, they're given for meeting a set of criteria.
no subject
Also, I was too lazy to look up just what a plenary indulgence required. :D
no subject
no subject
My first thought on reading your post (since I can't be bothered to register with the NYTimes) was: First anti-Semitism, then placing gay-bashing over anti-torture, and now selling indulgences? Is Ratzinger actually TRYING to destroy the Catholic Church?
no subject
no subject
no subject